Chapter 18 · Shloka 25— The Yoga of Liberation through Renunciation
इस श्लोक का हिंदी अनुवाद पढ़ें →अनुबन्धं क्षयं हिंसामनपेक्ष्य च पौरुषम्।मोहादारभ्यते कर्म यत्तत्तामसमुच्यते॥
Transliteration
anubandhaṁ kṣhayaṁ hinsām anapekṣhya cha pauruṣham mohād ārabhyate karma yat tat tāmasam uchyate
Word-by-word meaning
- anubandham
- — consequences
- kṣhayam
- — loss
- hinsām
- — injury
- anapekṣhya
- — by disregarding
- cha
- — and
- pauruṣham
- — one’s own ability
- mohāt
- — out of delusion
- ārabhyate
- — is begun
- karma
- — action
- yat
- — which
- tat
- — that
- tāmasam
- — in the mode of ignorance
- uchyate
- — is declared to be
Meaning
That action which is undertaken from delusion, without regard for the consequences, loss, injury, and one's own ability, is declared to be Tamasic (dark).
Commentary
Krishna describes tamasic action: 'That action undertaken from delusion, without regard to consequences, loss, harm to others, or one's own capacity — is called tamasic.' Krishna gives the lowest form of action. 'Anubandham ksayam himsam anaveksya ca paurusam' — without regard to (anaveksya) consequences (anubandha), loss (ksaya), harm/injury (himsa), and one's own ability/capacity (paurusa). 'Mohad arabhyate karma yat tat tamasam ucyate' — that action undertaken (arabhyate) from delusion (moha) — that is called (ucyate) tamasic (tamasa). Shankaracharya highlights the four marks of tamasic action: (1) blind to consequences (no thought of what will follow), (2) blind to loss (no awareness of cost), (3) blind to harm caused to others, and (4) blind to one's own capacity (overreaching or underreaching without awareness). The root is 'moha' — delusion, fog. The action is taken without the relevant seeing. Tamasic action is reckless action: unaware of what it triggers, what it costs, who it hurts, or whether the doer can even sustain it. It's not malicious so much as fog-driven — but it produces real damage because the seeing was absent. This verse describes tamasic action as reckless action — blind to consequences, costs, harm, and capacity, undertaken from delusion. The insight worth drawing out is the precise definition of recklessness — and the recognition that much harm comes not from malice but from this kind of blind action. The four 'without-regard-to' items are illuminating: not noticing consequences (what will this trigger downstream?), not noticing loss (what does this cost?), not noticing harm (who gets hurt?), and not noticing capacity (can I really do this? should I?). When action is taken without any of these awarenesses, it's tamasic. The root is fog, not evil intent. Most harmful action probably falls in this category: not deliberately malicious, but undertaken without the relevant seeing. Drunk driving, impulsive decisions, cutting words said in anger, projects launched without thinking through capacity — these are tamasic. The damage is real even though the malice may be absent. The lesson: cultivate the four awarenesses before significant action. Before you act, take a moment: What consequences will this trigger? What does this cost (in time, energy, relationships, money)? Whom does this affect or harm? Can I actually sustain this with my real capacity? When you take action while genuinely seeing these four things, your action rises out of tamasic recklessness. Even meeting one or two of these awarenesses is valuable. The four together describe action grounded in clear-eyed awareness — the opposite of fog-driven recklessness that causes so much avoidable harm.
How is Bhagavad Gita 18.25 relevant to modern life?
The insight worth drawing out is the precise definition of recklessness — and the genuinely important recognition that much real harm in the world comes not from malice or evil intent but from this kind of blind, fog-driven action. The four 'without-regard-to' items Krishna names are illuminating diagnostics: not noticing consequences (what will this actually trigger downstream?), not noticing loss (what does this genuinely cost?), not noticing harm (who gets hurt by this?), and not noticing capacity (can I really do this? should I even be attempting it?). When action is taken without any of these basic awarenesses, it's tamasic by Krishna's definition. The root is fog and inattention, not evil intent. Most harmful action in the world probably falls into this category: not deliberately malicious, but undertaken without the relevant seeing and reflection. Drunk driving, impulsive financial decisions, cutting words said in anger, projects launched without honestly thinking through capacity, careless words posted online — these are all tamasic by this definition. The damage is real and substantial even though the malice may be entirely absent. The lesson: actively cultivate the four awarenesses before any significant action. Before you act on something that matters, take a real moment to ask: What consequences will this trigger downstream? What does this actually cost (in time, energy, relationships, money, reputation)? Whom does this affect or potentially harm? Can I actually sustain this with my real, honest capacity? When you take action while genuinely seeing these four things clearly, your action rises out of tamasic recklessness into something more responsible. Even meeting one or two of these awarenesses is genuinely valuable; the four together describe action grounded in clear-eyed awareness — the precise opposite of the fog-driven recklessness that causes so much real and avoidable harm in the world.
What does Bhagavad Gita 18.25 teach today's generation (Gen Z & millennials)?
The insight worth drawing out is the precise definition of recklessness — and the genuinely important recognition that much real harm in the world comes not from malice or evil intent but from this kind of blind, fog-driven action. The four 'without-regard-to' items Krishna names are illuminating diagnostics: not noticing consequences (what will this actually trigger downstream?), not noticing loss (what does this genuinely cost?), not noticing harm (who gets hurt by this?), and not noticing capacity (can I really do this? should I even be attempting it?). When action is taken without any of these basic awarenesses, it's tamasic by Krishna's definition. The root is fog and inattention, not evil intent. Most harmful action in the world probably falls into this category: not deliberately malicious, but undertaken without the relevant seeing and reflection. Impulsive decisions, cutting words said in anger, projects launched without honestly thinking through capacity, careless words posted online — these are all tamasic by this definition. The damage is real and substantial even though the malice may be entirely absent. The lesson: actively cultivate the four awarenesses before any significant action. Before you act on something that matters, take a real moment to ask: What consequences will this trigger downstream? What does this actually cost (in time, energy, relationships, money, reputation)? Whom does this affect or potentially harm? Can I actually sustain this with my real, honest capacity? When you take action while genuinely seeing these four things clearly, your action rises out of tamasic recklessness into something more responsible. Even meeting one or two of these awarenesses is genuinely valuable; the four together describe action grounded in clear-eyed awareness — the precise opposite of the fog-driven recklessness that causes so much real and avoidable harm.
What does Bhagavad Gita 18.25 mean explained simply for kids?
Krishna describes the WORST kind of action — tamasic! It's when someone does something WITHOUT thinking about: (1) what will HAPPEN because of it, (2) what it will COST, (3) WHO will get hurt, or (4) whether they can even DO it! It's just acting without thinking clearly! Here's an important and helpful idea: most of the time when people do harmful things, they're not BAD — they just didn't THINK first! They acted in a fog! So a really wise habit before doing something important is to PAUSE and ask FOUR questions: (1) 'What will happen because of this?' (2) 'What will this cost me (time, energy, friendships)?' (3) 'Will anyone get hurt by this?' (4) 'Can I actually do this well?' When you ask these four questions before acting, you avoid LOTS of trouble! Think about it: if someone is about to say something mean in anger, they could pause and think: 'What will this do to my friend? What will it cost our friendship?' That pause changes everything! So here's the lesson: BEFORE doing important things, PAUSE and check the FOUR things — what will happen, what will it cost, who might get hurt, and can I actually do it well? Even just one or two of these questions saves you from lots of mistakes! Quick thinking before acting is much better than 'oops!' after. The wise person LOOKS before LEAPING. Train yourself to pause — it's a superpower!
Related shlokas
Chapter context
The longest chapter summarizes the entire Gita: the difference between renunciation (sannyasa) and relinquishment (tyaga), action by the gunas, the duties by nature, and the supreme instruction — surrender all to God, who will free you from all sins.
Read chapter →