Chapter 17 · Shloka 18— The Yoga of the Threefold Faith
इस श्लोक का हिंदी अनुवाद पढ़ें →सत्कारमानपूजार्थं तपो दम्भेन चैव यत्।क्रियते तदिह प्रोक्तं राजसं चलमध्रुवम्॥
Transliteration
satkāra-māna-pūjārthaṁ tapo dambhena chaiva yat kriyate tad iha proktaṁ rājasaṁ chalam adhruvam
Word-by-word meaning
- sat-kāra
- — respect
- māna
- — honor
- pūjā
- — adoration
- artham
- — for the sake of
- tapaḥ
- — austerity
- dambhena
- — with ostentation
- cha
- — also
- eva
- — certainly
- yat
- — which
- kriyate
- — is performed
- tat
- — that
- iha
- — in this world
- proktam
- — is said
- rājasam
- — in the mode of passion
- chalam
- — flickering
- adhruvam
- — temporary
Meaning
The austerity that is practiced with the aim of gaining good reception, honor, and worship, and with hypocrisy, is said to be Rajasic, unstable, and transient.
Commentary
Krishna describes rajasic austerity: 'That austerity which is done for the sake of gaining respect, honor, and reverence, and with ostentation, is here called rajasic; it is unstable and impermanent.' Krishna describes the rajasic kind of discipline. 'Satkara-mana-pujartham tapo dambhena caiva yat' — that austerity (tapas) which is done for the sake of (artham) gaining good treatment (satkara), honor (mana), and reverence/worship (puja), and with ostentation/hypocrisy (dambha). 'Kriyate tad iha proktam rajasam calam adhruvam' — is done — that is here (iha) called rajasic (rajasa); it is unstable (cala) and impermanent (adhruva). Shankaracharya highlights the motive that makes austerity rajasic: it's done 'for the sake of gaining respect, honor, and reverence' — to win admiration, status, and recognition from others — and 'with ostentation' (to be seen, to impress). The discipline becomes a performance for an audience, a means to social reward. And Krishna adds a telling observation: such austerity is 'cala and adhruva' — unstable and impermanent. Discipline done for external recognition doesn't last, because it depends on the audience and the reward; when the recognition isn't forthcoming, or the audience isn't watching, the motivation collapses. Reward-driven, performed discipline is inherently unstable. This verse describes rajasic austerity: discipline done to gain respect, honor, and recognition, and for show. And it adds a key insight: such reward-driven discipline is unstable and doesn't last. The insight worth drawing out is the keen observation that discipline driven by the desire for recognition and done for show is inherently UNSTABLE and impermanent ('cala and adhruva') — it doesn't last, because its motivation is external and conditional. This is a genuinely practical psychological insight, not just a moral judgment. When you undertake a discipline mainly to gain respect, honor, admiration, or to impress others (and to be seen doing it), your motivation is fundamentally external — it depends entirely on the audience and the reward. And this makes the discipline fragile and short-lived: when the recognition doesn't come, when the audience stops watching, when the admiration fades or the social reward dries up, the motivation collapses, and the discipline falls apart. This explains a very common pattern: the practices, habits, and disciplines we take up mainly for external recognition (to impress others, to gain status, to perform an identity, to post about) tend not to last — they fizzle out the moment the external payoff fades. By contrast, discipline rooted in genuine intrinsic motivation (sattvic — done for its own worth, with wholehearted faith) is far more stable and lasting, because it doesn't depend on any audience or reward; it's self-sustaining. This is why intrinsically motivated practice endures while externally motivated practice reliably collapses. The lesson: if you want your disciplines and good habits to actually LAST, root them in genuine intrinsic motivation, not in the desire for recognition, status, or show. Discipline done mainly to impress others or gain admiration is inherently unstable — it predictably collapses the moment the external reward fades or the audience looks away. Notice honestly when your practices are driven by the desire to be seen and admired, because those won't endure. The durable disciplines are the ones you do for their own genuine worth, with your whole heart, regardless of whether anyone notices. So if you want lasting change, stop performing your discipline for an audience and start doing it for its own real value. Intrinsic motivation lasts; the desire for recognition is fickle and fragile. Build your practices on the stable foundation, not the shifting sand of others' attention.
How is Bhagavad Gita 17.18 relevant to modern life?
The insight worth drawing out is the keen and genuinely practical observation that discipline driven by the desire for recognition and done for show is inherently UNSTABLE and impermanent ('cala and adhruva') — it doesn't last, precisely because its motivation is external and conditional. This is a genuinely useful psychological insight, not merely a moral judgment. When you undertake a discipline or practice mainly to gain respect, honor, admiration, or status, or to impress others (and especially to be seen doing it), your motivation is fundamentally external — it depends entirely on the audience and the reward continuing to show up. And this dependence makes the discipline fragile and short-lived: the moment the recognition doesn't come, the audience stops watching, the admiration fades, or the social reward dries up, the motivation simply collapses, and the discipline falls apart and gets abandoned. This precisely explains a very common and frustrating pattern in modern life: the practices, habits, diets, fitness regimens, and disciplines we take up mainly for external recognition (to impress others, gain status, perform an identity, get the likes, post about the journey) tend reliably NOT to last — they fizzle out the moment the external payoff fades or stops coming. By sharp contrast, discipline rooted in genuine intrinsic motivation (the sattvic kind — done for its own real worth, with wholehearted faith) is far more stable and lasting, because it doesn't depend on any audience or external reward at all; it's genuinely self-sustaining. This is the real reason intrinsically motivated practice endures over years while externally motivated practice reliably collapses within weeks. The lesson: if you genuinely want your disciplines, habits, and good practices to actually LAST over time, you must root them in real intrinsic motivation, not in the desire for recognition, status, or show. Discipline done mainly to impress others or gain admiration is structurally unstable — it predictably collapses the moment the external reward fades or the audience looks away. So notice honestly when your practices are secretly driven by the desire to be seen and admired, because those particular ones simply won't endure, no matter how intense they are at first. The durable, lasting disciplines are always the ones you do for their own genuine worth, with your whole heart, regardless of whether anyone notices or applauds. So if you want real lasting change, stop performing your discipline for an audience and start doing it for its own real value. Intrinsic motivation lasts and compounds; the desire for recognition is fickle, conditional, and fragile. Build your practices on that stable inner foundation, not on the shifting sand of others' attention and approval.
What does Bhagavad Gita 17.18 teach today's generation (Gen Z & millennials)?
The insight worth drawing out is the keen and genuinely practical observation that discipline driven by the desire for recognition and done for show is inherently UNSTABLE and impermanent ('cala and adhruva') — it doesn't last, precisely because its motivation is external and conditional. This is a genuinely useful psychological insight, not just a moral judgment. When you undertake a discipline or practice mainly to gain respect, honor, admiration, status, or to impress others (and especially to be seen doing it), your motivation is fundamentally external — it depends entirely on the audience and the reward continuing to show up. And this dependence makes the discipline fragile and short-lived: the moment the recognition doesn't come, the audience stops watching, the admiration fades, or the social reward dries up, the motivation just collapses, and the discipline falls apart and gets abandoned. This precisely explains a super common and frustrating pattern: the practices, habits, diets, fitness routines, and disciplines we take up mainly for external recognition (to impress people, gain status, perform an identity, get the likes, post about our 'journey') tend reliably NOT to last — they fizzle out the moment the external payoff fades or stops coming. By sharp contrast, discipline rooted in genuine intrinsic motivation (the sattvic kind — done for its own real worth, with wholehearted faith) is far more stable and lasting, because it doesn't depend on any audience or external reward at all; it's genuinely self-sustaining. This is the real reason intrinsically motivated practice endures over years while externally motivated practice reliably collapses within weeks. The lesson: if you genuinely want your disciplines, habits, and good practices to actually LAST, you have to root them in real intrinsic motivation, not in the desire for recognition, status, or show. Discipline done mainly to impress others or gain admiration is structurally unstable — it predictably collapses the moment the external reward fades or the audience looks away. So notice honestly when your practices are secretly driven by the desire to be seen and admired, because those particular ones just won't endure, no matter how intense they are at first. The durable, lasting disciplines are always the ones you do for their own genuine worth, with your whole heart, regardless of whether anyone notices or claps. So if you want real lasting change, stop performing your discipline for an audience and start doing it for its own real value. Intrinsic motivation lasts and compounds; the desire for recognition is fickle, conditional, and fragile. Build your practices on that stable inner foundation, not on the shifting sand of others' attention and approval.
What does Bhagavad Gita 17.18 mean explained simply for kids?
Krishna describes the restless (rajasic) kind of discipline: doing it to get respect, honor, and praise from others, and to show off! And he adds a really smart observation: this kind of discipline DOESN'T LAST — it's unstable and falls apart! Here's the super useful insight: when you do something hard mainly to impress people or get praise, that motivation doesn't last very long! Why? Because it depends on OTHERS — on people watching, admiring, and praising you. The moment people stop paying attention, or the praise stops coming, you lose your motivation and quit! Think about it: have you ever started something just to impress people — and then gave up as soon as nobody was watching or cheering? That's the rajasic pattern! It's like a fire that needs constant outside fuel — when the fuel (praise) stops, the fire goes out! But discipline you do because you TRULY value it — with your whole heart, just because it's good — lasts way longer! It doesn't need anyone watching, because YOU care about it for real! So here's the lesson: if you want your good habits and practices to actually LAST, do them for real reasons — because you genuinely value them — not just to impress people or get praise! The practices you do just for show fizzle out fast. But the ones you do because you truly care keep going strong, whether anyone's watching or not. So stop performing for an audience, and start doing things because they truly matter to you. That's how to make good habits that actually last a lifetime!
Related shlokas
Chapter context
Krishna explains how faith (shraddha) takes three forms according to the gunas, and classifies food, sacrifice, austerity and charity accordingly. He explains the sacred utterance 'Om Tat Sat'.
Read chapter →